Gujarat's founders tend to be unusually commercially focused — the first question is almost always what a build costs and what it returns, which I find refreshing. Ahmedabad and Surat send me a mix of trading, textile and logistics businesses wanting to move operations off spreadsheets and WhatsApp.
I have shipped over 70 projects, mostly for Indian founders and small product teams, plus clients in the UK and US. Everything is built and deployed by me directly — no team, nothing subcontracted. I am based in Bengaluru and work remotely across India.
Projects from Gujarat are usually tightly scoped and decision-making is fast, which keeps timelines short. Expect me to push back if the scope grows mid-build, because that is what actually breaks budgets.
Multi-tenant SaaS platforms with subscriptions, auth, and admin panels — production-ready from day one.
Custom AI agents, OpenAI integrations, and workflow automation built directly into your product.
High-performance iOS & Android apps built with React Native — standalone or alongside your SaaS.
Next.js listing platform for pre-launch and under-construction Bangalore developments — unit-level inventory with per-configuration pricing and availability, and budget filtering that reasons across configurations rather than projects.
Next.js site for a curated luxury property advisory — a single search across property, location, city and builder, and a schema model that describes a consultative service rather than a listings catalogue.
WordPress build for a luxury real-estate services company across four cities — Elementor Pro templates over a JetEngine content model, JetSearch property search, and a handover the client's own team could operate.
Gujarat work is commercial and specific — trading, textiles, logistics businesses moving operations off spreadsheets and WhatsApp. The question I get first is what it costs and what it returns, which makes scoping unusually efficient.
Decisions here are fast, which keeps timelines short, and I hold scope firmly because that is what actually protects the budget. If the feature list grows mid-build I will say so and price it rather than absorb it quietly.
A focused operations tool runs ₹3–6 lakh. Multi-location inventory with role-based access runs ₹6–10 lakh. The driver is how many exceptions your process contains, not the technology.
There is no team behind me and nothing is subcontracted. The person you scope the project with is the person writing the code, which removes an entire category of translation loss. The trade is capacity — I take a small number of projects at a time, and I will tell you if I cannot start when you need to.
The repository lives under your account and the cloud infrastructure is provisioned in yours. You should never be in a position where changing developer means losing your product. Handover documentation is part of the work rather than something negotiated at the end.
A deposit to start, then payments tied to milestones you can see working in a staging environment. Never the full amount upfront in either direction. If a project stops early, you keep everything built to that point.
Every project gets a written scope split into launch and later, with an explicit not-included list. That second list prevents most disputes, because disagreement almost always comes from an assumption nobody wrote down.
For a focused internal tool replacing spreadsheets — auth, a core workflow, reporting and an admin view — ₹3–6 lakh is realistic. The cost is driven far more by how many exceptions your process has than by the technology.
Yes. Multi-language interfaces are straightforward to build; the effort is in translation and maintaining it as the product changes, not in the code.
Let's talk.
Hiring for a senior role or have an interesting problem to solve? Drop a note — I read every message.
Prefer email? Send to dharmendrasinghyadav022@gmail.com
Reply within 24 hours. No newsletter, no automated sequence.