What I build for businesses here
Chhattisgarh businesses are often digitising for the first time — supply chain, trading, operations that have run on paper and phone calls until now.
Chhattisgarh's industrial and agricultural economy produces practical software needs — supply chain, trading platforms and operations tools for businesses that have run on paper and phone calls until now.

I have shipped over 70 projects, mostly for Indian founders and small product teams, plus clients in the UK and US. Everything is built and deployed by me directly — no team, nothing subcontracted. I am based in Bengaluru and work remotely across India.
First-time digitisation projects succeed or fail on change management rather than code. I would rather build something narrow that people actually use than something comprehensive they work around.
Multi-tenant SaaS platforms with subscriptions, auth, and admin panels — production-ready from day one.
Custom AI agents, OpenAI integrations, and workflow automation built directly into your product.
High-performance iOS & Android apps built with React Native — standalone or alongside your SaaS.
Next.js listing platform for pre-launch and under-construction Bangalore developments — unit-level inventory with per-configuration pricing and availability, and budget filtering that reasons across configurations rather than projects.
Next.js site for a curated luxury property advisory — a single search across property, location, city and builder, and a schema model that describes a consultative service rather than a listings catalogue.
WordPress build for a luxury real-estate services company across four cities — Elementor Pro templates over a JetEngine content model, JetSearch property search, and a handover the client's own team could operate.
Chhattisgarh businesses are often digitising for the first time — supply chain, trading, operations that have run on paper and phone calls until now.
These projects succeed on adoption rather than code. I build the narrow version, get it used daily by the people who will use it, then expand. A comprehensive system nobody adopts is worse than a small one they do.
A first operations tool runs ₹2.5–5 lakh. I would rather start narrow and expand on evidence than quote a full system that gets worked around.
There is no team behind me and nothing is subcontracted. The person you scope the project with is the person writing the code, which removes an entire category of translation loss. The trade is capacity — I take a small number of projects at a time, and I will tell you if I cannot start when you need to.
The repository lives under your account and the cloud infrastructure is provisioned in yours. You should never be in a position where changing developer means losing your product. Handover documentation is part of the work rather than something negotiated at the end.
A deposit to start, then payments tied to milestones you can see working in a staging environment. Never the full amount upfront in either direction. If a project stops early, you keep everything built to that point.
Every project gets a written scope split into launch and later, with an explicit not-included list. That second list prevents most disputes, because disagreement almost always comes from an assumption nobody wrote down.
With the one process that costs you the most time, not with a complete system. A narrow tool people adopt beats a comprehensive one they route around.
That depends far more on design than on training. Building for the actual users, on the devices they actually have, is the difference between adoption and shelfware.
Let's talk.
Hiring for a senior role or have an interesting problem to solve? Drop a note — I read every message.
Prefer email? Send to dharmendrasinghyadav022@gmail.com
Reply within 24 hours. No newsletter, no automated sequence.