Growth

Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)

Get your business cited by ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews — technical access, extractable content, and a consistent entity.

What's included

  • AI crawler access audit (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot, Google-Extended)
  • llms.txt generation from live content
  • Server-render audit — content readable without JavaScript
  • Extractable-fact rewriting with specifics and numbers
  • Entity consolidation across profiles and sameAs
  • Citation baseline and monthly re-checks
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — service offered by Dharmendra Singh Yadav

Being Cited, Not Just Ranked

When someone asks an AI assistant which developer to hire or how to solve a problem, it reads several sources, synthesises an answer, and names a few of them. If you are not among the sources, you are absent from that conversation no matter where you rank on Google.

The First Thing I Check, and Why

Before anything else I check whether the AI crawlers are permitted to read your site at all. This sounds trivial. It is the single most common reason a business is never cited.

Many site templates, SEO plugins and privacy-minded defaults ship with GPTBot, ClaudeBot, CCBot and Google-Extended disallowed in robots.txt. That is a legitimate choice for a publisher protecting content, and precisely the wrong one for a business that wants recommending. You cannot be cited by a system that is not allowed to read you.

Google-Extended is the one almost everyone misses — it controls AI Overviews and Gemini grounding separately from normal Google indexing, so a site can rank perfectly well and still be excluded from every AI answer.

I found exactly this on my own site while building it out. The permissive robots.txt being served was masking a code default that blocked every AI crawler — one file change away from invisibility.

Can They Actually Read the Page?

The second check is whether your content exists in the served HTML. Many modern sites assemble their pages in the browser, so a crawler that does not execute JavaScript receives an empty shell.

The same applies to interface patterns. Accordions that only render their content when clicked are a common trap — the questions ship in the HTML and the answers do not, so the page advertises questions it never answers. That one is invisible in a browser and obvious in the source.

Making Content Worth Quoting

Models lift specifics. "We offer competitive pricing" cannot be quoted. "A focused SaaS MVP costs ₹4–7 lakh and takes 8–10 weeks" can be lifted, attributed, and reused.

So the content work is concrete: put the direct answer in the opening two sentences, replace vague claims with numbers and named thresholds, and structure each section so it makes sense read in isolation, because that is how it will be read.

Entity Consistency

Models weight sources they can identify confidently. That means the same name, the same description and the same URL across every profile you own, tied together with sameAs markup so the connections are explicit rather than inferred.

This is unglamorous and it is most of the work. Fragmented naming across profiles is why a lot of businesses are readable but never recognised.

What I Deliver

A crawler access audit and fix, a generated llms.txt built from your live content so it cannot drift, a server-render audit, rewrites of your highest-value pages for extractability, entity consolidation across your profiles, and a citation baseline you can re-check yourself.

What I Will Not Claim

There is no way to guarantee a citation, no placement to purchase, and no reliable analytics for this yet. Volume from AI referrals is currently a fraction of organic search.

What GEO does offer is a surface where the ranking factors are far less entrenched. Winning a citation depends much more on having answered a specific question clearly than on years of accumulated backlinks — which makes it one of the few channels where a smaller business competes on close to even terms.

Frequently asked

No, and nobody can. There is no placement to buy and no ranking to game. What is controllable is whether the models can read you, whether your content is easy to quote and attribute, and whether your entity is consistent enough to be recognised. Anyone guaranteeing citations is selling something that does not exist.

It blocks the crawlers, usually without realising. Site templates and SEO plugins frequently ship with GPTBot, ClaudeBot and Google-Extended disallowed in robots.txt. Google-Extended is the one nearly everyone misses — it governs AI Overviews and Gemini separately from ordinary indexing. The second most common cause is content that only renders in the browser, so a crawler sees an empty shell.

It is a plain-Markdown summary of your site aimed at AI systems, served at /llms.txt. It is an emerging convention rather than a ratified standard, so no engine is obliged to read it and it will not by itself get you cited. It is cheap, directionally right, and I would rather set expectations honestly than oversell it.

AEO targets search surfaces — featured snippets, People Also Ask, voice. GEO targets generative systems that synthesise an answer from several sources and cite a few. The technical foundation overlaps heavily, but GEO puts far more weight on crawler permissions, factual specificity, and how consistently your brand appears across the wider web.

By recording a baseline: ask ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google's AI results your target questions and note who gets cited. Re-check monthly. It is manual and imperfect — there is no Search Console for this yet — but it is honest, and far better than reporting activity instead of outcomes.

Let's talk.

Building production-grade SaaS, AI agents and mobile apps end-to-end.

Hiring for a senior role or have an interesting problem to solve? Drop a note — I read every message.